Electoral Count reform could fade away; now McConnell doesn’t need it to lure Manchin, Sinema

It’s not that a repair isn’t necessary, nor does it mean that they’re not a good idea. the Washington Post One of them was reported this week by Greg Sargent, writing that “senators are about to finalize a bill to review the Electoral Counting Act of 1887,” with legislation that would “fix ambiguities in the anti-corruption law that Trump has exploited squarely in his wide-ranging 2020 project.” . Piece.” He stated that independent Maine Senator Angus King is leading the effort, and that there is agreement that the law as it stands “presents a clear and established threat to democracy.”

King is supposed to introduce the bill “in the coming weeks” alongside Democratic Senators Dick Durbin and Amy Klobuchar, but not until the push for greater voting rights and election reform bills ends. “It is very important to stress that this is not a solution to the voting rights issues that have been raised across the country,” King told Sargent.

The goal of the legislation would be Trump’s stabilization of the electoral count in Congress—setting a higher bar for willing (or, after Trump, a splinter group of members) to try to nullify legitimate voters from states with fake lists. The main thing is to maintain protections in law to allow Congress to invalidate those bogus lists if a state legislature or governor attempts to overthrow the will of their state’s electors. As it stands, it takes one representative and one senator to challenge the state’s electors, and only a simple majority to support that objection and cast votes.

The proposed bill would require large blocks of both representatives and senators to file objections, perhaps as much as a third of each body. It would also require an overwhelming majority – perhaps as much as three-fifths – of members in both the House and Senate to support an objection. It’s a good, smart, and necessary correction. Some Republicans — even Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell — might want to see that actually happen. He. She Probably Get 10 Republicans to break the hold. There are a few—Maine’s Susan Collins, Utah’s Mitt Romney, North Carolina’s Tom Telles, Mississippi’s Roger Wicker—who have made noise about it.

“I can’t count 10 Republicans right now, but I don’t think it’s unlikely,” King told Sargent. “I see this as more of a bipartisan issue.”

In truth, it should only be a bipartisan issue, if Republicans believe Manchin and Cinema will help Democrats with bigger reforms. What Republicans have been doing so far, including supposed bipartisan gangster Susan Collins, was rumored to have been gathering with Manchin and Cinema last week, which is way beyond McConnell’s usual way to get to the usual suspects and lure them away from taking action with The specter of “two parties”.

Enough straight Democrats, as well as Senator King, have seen the trick for what it is and insist that it cannot be a substitute for protecting voting rights. The bigger question now is whether it will still be on the table after Mansion and Cinema wave McConnell’s white flag.

Leave a Comment